Court stops NASS from overriding Buhari on Electoral Act
News & Trends •
ogbozor said they were served barely 48 hours and insisted that the matter cannot proceed1 the federal high court in abuja has ordered the national assembly to stopfurther action or proceeding on the electoral act amendment bill which president muhammadu buhari rejected1 the ruling is a sequel to an oral application made in a suit filed by the accord party against the national assembly the attorney general of the federation and the independent national electoral commission inec1 in the ruling the court ordered the parties to maintain status quo ante bellum1 all the parties are ordered to stay every proceeding pending the determination of the motion on notice filed by the accord party1 the accord party had approached the court with a motion seeking an order of interlocutory injunction restraining the national assembly from taking any further action or actions on the bill titled electoral act amendment bill 2018 particularly to convene to pass the said bill into law by two-thirds majority of its two chambers pending the final determination of the substantive originating summon1 counsel to the national assembly mr. chinelo ogbozor had resisted attempts made by counsel to the accord party mr. wole olanipekun to move his motion on notice seeking a restraining order against the national assembly on the grounds that the application was not ripe and pending the service of hearing notice on the agf1 the restraining order was issued on wednesday by justice ahmed mohammed of the high court1 in view of ogbozors opposition olanipekun urged the court for ogbozor to make an undertaking that the national assembly would not take any action on the subject matter but she refused1 though the court noted that the motion on notice was not ripe for hearing it however took notice of the oral application made by olanipekun brought in line with section 585 of constitution1 justice mohammed stated that the court is not granting the prayer contained on the motion paper but is making the preservative order to safeguard the integrity and sanctity of court1 consequently the court directed parties to maintain status quo ante bellum at least to the next adjournment1 the matter has been adjourned to march 20 for the hearing of the motion on notice filed by the plaintiff1 the accord party is seeking among other reliefs a declaration that the legislative powers vested in the national assembly by the constitution do not empower or imbue it with the right liberty or authority to pass or purport to pass any bill into law which attempts to interfere with or undermine the independence of the 3rd defendant as guaranteed by the content spirit and tenor of the constitution1